Friday, September 30, 2011

My design: Sofortig(a) Shelter - part 2

          Within the second design problem, designing a cost effective shelter, are five smaller problems.  The first problem is the type of materials that are incorporated into the shelter’s design.  To help create a cost effective shelter, local materials, that conserve energy, are used.  This is achieved by using a material whose color, reflectivity, and thickness matches that of the regional’s environmental needs.  In addition, light durable materials are used to create lightweight shelter packs to ease during the shelter’s transportation to the desired location by both vehicular and pedestrian methods. 
          The second problem is to analyze the various ways the shelter can arrive at the desired site or village.  When doing this, four ways were analyzed (train, tractor trailer, cargo barge, and cargo airplane).  Using an average 100 car train, 400 shelters can be transported.  Using an average 53 foot long tractor trailer, 4 shelters can be transported.  An average Boeing 747 can carry 250,000 pounds of cargo.  With the 4,000 pound proposed shelter,  a cargo plane could carry 62 shelters.  An average cargo barge can carry 20,000 tones.  With the 4,000 pound proposed shelter, plus the weight of a shipping container, a cargo barge could carry 2,020 shelters.  Therefore, with the village’s close proximity to the Mississippi River, the most practical transportation method is a cargo barge. 

          Other graphics that need to be explained to help solve the first two problem statements are the shelter’s floor plan, elevations, and shelter model pictures.  The floor plan shows the layout of the needed spaces, as well as a general layout of the furniture and appliances.  The four elevations show the slopped roof for colleting rainwater, the various sizes and treatments of the windows, and how the adjustable legs raise the shelter to fit a changing grade.
Shelter Floor Plan


 Elevations

                                    North Elevation                           West Elevation

                                 South Elevation                               East Elevation

Model Pictures

                                  Base Structure                     Wood Floor Structure

                                   Interior Walls                            Exterior Walls

                             Shelter's South Elevation            Shelter's east Elevation

                                    Shelter's Interior                        Shelter's Interior

          After a natural disaster, the area’s water and power sources can be disconnected for weeks.  To help solve this problem, solar gaining fabric, a solar battery (A), and a cistern system (B) is incorporated into the design.  In addition, these elements, once the city’s sources are reconnected, can increase the shelter’s cost effectiveness by decreasing the inhabitants’ water and electric bills. 
A: Electrical Detail Section

B: Plumbing Detail Section

          Due to these five cost effective techniques, the materials of the pre-designed temporary shelter, on an average, costs $14,260.  However, the estimated does not take the manufacturing, transportation, and storage costs into consideration.  Even if the shelters material cost by was multiplied by a factor of 1.5 ($21, 390), the proposed 448 square foot  pre-designed shelter would still cost $34,350 less than that of that of an average 350 square foot FEMA trailer. 

  •   (4) Electrical  1500 Watt Baseboard Heaters 6K2415A        $252
  •   (2) Harbor Breeze 52" Matte Black Ceiling Fan                    $80
  •   Other Portable Heaters, Lighting, and Fans                          $280
  •   (3) Mohawk Home 2' x 3'4" Kodiak Beige Area Rug             $102         12 lbs
  •   Traditional Oak Laminate Flooring ($1.40 per sqft)              $627         100lbs
  •   (10) 4’ x 8’ ¾” Plywood Base Struceure                                 $250         526 lbs
  •   (2) ReliaBilt 36"W 6-Panel Steel Entry Door                          $238         40 lbs
  •   (2) ReliaBilt 36" Flush Hollow Wood Interior Door                $50           40 lbs
  •   (2) ReliaBilt 36" Flush Composite Bifold Door                       $50           40 lbs
  •   (8) BetterBilt  Single Hung Aluminum Window                      $600         350 lbs
  •   Sun-Mar Spacesaver Composting Toilet                                $1,400
  •   Whirlpool  50-Gallon Electric Water Heater                            $313
  •   InnoVida's Fiber Composite Panel Syste
                4” Ceiling Panel                     $1,871              512 lbs
                4” Exterior Wall Panel           $3,020              826 lbs
                2.5” Interior Wall                   $2,469              484 lbs

  •   325 Gallon Cistern 54" x 56"                                                 $413
  •   Whirlpool 9.6 Cu. Ft. Top-Freezer Refrigerator                     $349
  •   FTL Solar's Lightweight and Flexible Solar Fabric                 $750
  •   Sun Xtender, sealed AGM deep cycle battery                       $332
  •   Black Vinyl Industrial Roofing Tarp (20’ x 30’)                      $96         78 lbs
  •   Continental Cabinets, Inc. 30" Oak Cabinets                        $106
  •   Continental Cabinets, Inc. 36" Oak  Cabinets                       $99
  •   (2) Continental Cabinets, Inc. 30" x 12" Oak Cabinets         $102
  •   Moen Double-Basin Stainless Steel Kitchen Sink                  $64
  •   Aqua Glass 32"W x 32"D x 78"H Gelcoat Shower Unit         $309
  •   Dacor GlideRack for 30 In. Wall Oven                                   $249
  •   ESTATE by RSI  24 x 18 White Shaker Vanity with Top          $59
  •   Amerimax 2" x 3" x 10' White Aluminum Downspout           $9              5 lbs
  •   (3) Amerimax 5" x 10' K White Aluminum Gutter                  $25           30 lbs
  •   (2) Essential Home Bunk Bed - Walnut                                 $360
  •   6 and 12 Guage Steel Base Structure                                    $1,394      511 lbs
  •   (5) Charlotte Pipe 2" x 10' PVC Schedule 40 Pipe                 $30            44 lbs
  •   Wood for the Decking                                                            $150         200 lbs
  •   Adjustable Trailer Bench/Seat                                               $225         80 lbs 
                                                Total Cost = $14, 474                                                        
                                                Total Weight = 3, 888 lbs
              Above is a list of the materials, appliances, and furnishings that are incorporated into the design and construction of the proposed post-disaster temporary shelter.  The items with their weight listed are the only items that are included into the six kit-of-parts. 
 

Thursday, September 29, 2011

My Design: Sofortig(a) Shelter - part 1

The design of the proposed thesis project was used to answer three problem statements: the design of a comfortable adjustable temporary shelter, the design of a cost effective temporary shelter, and the design of a temporary shelter village.  Before designing any building or design, the project’s client(s) must be determined.  For the proposed post-disaster temporary shelter, there are at least three possible clients, FEMA, the Red Cross, and the nation’s insurance companies.  The insurance companies could create a natural disaster insurance plan, which resembles that of flood insurance.  In the case of a home becoming destroyed or deemed unlivable by a natural disaster, using the natural disaster insurance plan, a temporary shelter would be provided by the selected insurance company.  On the other hand, if the clients were FEMA or the Red Cross, a temporary shelter would either be given or sold to the displaced individuals.
Within the first design problem, creating a comfortable adjustable temporary shelter, are five smaller problems.  The first problem is to create a place to call “home” to shelter the displaced individuals through their transition from a post-disaster situation to more permanent housing options.  This begins with incorporating warm colors (cream, tan, and light green) and materials (various colors of wood ) to the temporary shelters interior (A) and exterior (B).
A: The Shelter's Interior

Temporaty Shelter's Living Room

Temporary Shelter's Kitchen

Temporary Shleter's Entry

Temporary Shleter's Beedroom

B: The Shelter's Exterior

Northwest Perspective of an ADA Shleter                     Northwest Perspective of Two Shelters

         The second way to accomplish the first problem is through supplying 100 more square feet of livable space, then that of a FEMA trailer.  These larger spaces also supply the inhabitants with more privacy using foldable walls in the bedroom, as well as a half wall that separates the entry and living area.
         The second problem is to control the interior’s temperature and humidity levels.  The first way to achieve this is to have a storage barrier between the shelter's roof and livable spaces.  This will allow the hot air to rise and become collected in this space.  This storage space will then be vented to allow the heat to escape (A).  The second way to control the temperature is to lift the shelter off the ground to allow cool breezes to pass underneath the shelter, causing the interior’s temperature of the spaces to be decreased (A).  In addition to those methods, two ceiling fans, four baseboard heaters, and ten operable windows are incorporated into the shelter’s design to help control the temperature and humidity levels within the shelter (B). 
Temperature Controlling Options

          The third problem is to create a shelter that can be expanded to fit a growing family size, or a unique family situation, such as grandparents staying with their family.  To connect two shelters together, a few things must be attached or modified: the exterior doors, the windows, the exterior walls, the decking, and the roofing (A). Once the two shelters are connected, the livable space increases to 896 square feet, which can comfortably shelter up to eight individuals. 
                                                              A: Connecting Two Shelters
Northwest Perspective of Two Shleters                        Wall Connection 1

                                      Wall Connection           2  Door Connection                  1  Door Connection 2

          The last problem is providing adjustable options to fit various regions within the United States, as well as adjustable elements to fit the needs and comfort levels of the shelter’s inhabitants.  The proposed shelter is designed for hot-humid, hot-arid, and temperate zones.  To achieve this, a few elements would need to be modified: the shelter’s color pallet, the size and placement of the windows, the type of window treatments, and the thickness and R-values of the interior and exterior walls (A).  For example, if in a temperate zone, a four inch wall is used, this provides an R-value of 23.7.  However, for a cold zone, a six inch wall would be used, providing the shelter with an R-value of 35.5. 
Along with a changing region, comes a change in how dramatic the contours are modify.  To solve this issue, adjustable legs are incorporated to keep the shelter a minimum of one foot above grade.  For a changing grade, the legs can extend a maximum of three feet; therefore, the shelter is able to fit a maximum grade change of three feet over a twenty-eight foot length B).  Due to the fact that no two people are the same, all of the shelter’s table and chair heights can be adjusted to fit the comfort needs of various age groups and abilities.  In addition, an ADA accessible ramp can be incorporated to the deck, if needed (C).
A: Regions within the United States

                                        Temperate Zone                           Living Room

                                      Hot-Humid Zone                            Living Room

                                         Hot-Arid Zone                             Living Room

B: Shelter's Adjustable Legs
Adjustable Leg Section

                                          Adjustable Leg Layout                    Adjustable Leg Detail    Adjustable Leg Iso

C: The Interior's Adjustable Elments

         Adjustable Tables                                                    Adjustable Seating

Wednesday, September 28, 2011

Elements Needed to Create an Independent Shelter

                In the weeks following Hurricane Katrina’s landfall, New Orleans was without electricity and potable water.  Due to this, there is a need to use natural sources (sun, water, and wind) as a secondary means to make the shelter an independent structure for a short period of time.  This will be achieved by collecting and storing the sun’s energy through utilizing solar fabric, similar to those found in solar, as well as a cistern system.

            The first element to create an independent shelter is photovoltaic fabric.  Photovoltaic (PV) fabric, which is made by layering a semi-conductive material around fibers, can be used to harvest the sun’s energy, as well as shading a structure from internal heat gain.  In the market of solar fabrics, there is one product that has made some cutting edge breakthroughs.  Researcher at Herriot-Watt University in Edinburg, UK, Tapas Mallick is experimenting with the highly refractive material, peispex, to complete a process called total internal reflection.  In this process, because of the concentrators shape, sunlight cannot escape; therefore, the light bounces around until it reaches a PV cell.  By incorporating this, Malick’s calculations show that one square foot of his fabric can produce up to 200 watts of usable energy.  In addition, “when [applied] to a window, the [solar fabric] would allow 25% of the available light through to illuminate the room.  In addition, the remaining 75% is used to generate electricity” (Knight , 2010, para.7).  The photovoltaic fabric would block the sun’s direct rays, as well as using its power to provide electricity to the temporary shelter.

Image 1 - A shelter using solar fabric to lighten the useable spaces during the night or a cloudy day

             The first element to create an independent shelter is photovoltaic fabric.  Photovoltaic (PV) fabric, which is made by layering a semi-conductive material around fibers, can be used to harvest the sun’s energy, as well as shading a structure from internal heat gain.  In the market of solar fabrics, there is one product that has made some cutting edge breakthroughs.  Researcher at Herriot-Watt University in Edinburg, UK, Tapas Mallick is experimenting with the highly refractive material, peispex, to complete a process called total internal reflection.  In this process, because of the concentrators shape, sunlight cannot escape; therefore, the light bounces around until it reaches a PV cell.  By incorporating this, Malick’s calculations show that one square foot of his fabric can produce up to 200 watts of usable energy.  In addition, “when [applied] to a window, the [solar fabric] would allow 25% of the available light through to illuminate the room.  In addition, the remaining 75% is used to generate electricity” (Knight , 2010, para.7).  The photovoltaic fabric would block the sun’s direct rays, as well as using its power to provide electricity to the temporary shelter.

Image 2 - The process of storing solar energy in a battery

             The second element to create an independent shelter is storing the solar energy.  Following a natural disaster, an area’s electricity can be down for several weeks, if not months.  Therefore, there is a need for a secondary power source.  This secondary source is solar energy.  However, there is a need to store unneeded energy for use on cloudy days.  The solution to this is the use of solar energy battery cells.  Deep cycle batteries are used in the storage of solar energy, due to the fact that they can discharge as much as 80% of their energy, over a longer period of time, without significant damage to the battery.  The type of deep cycle battery that will be incorporated into the shelter will be an AGM (Absorbed Glass Mat), due to the fact that its advantages and its ability to withstand harsh environments overweigh its increase in cost.  The following is a bulleted list of the AGM battery’s advantages:

·         No maintenance is required
·         It can withstand shock and vibrations
·         Its ability to take abuse
·         It is completely sealed against releasing fumes

      When choosing a battery, it is important to research the lifespan of that battery.  To determine a battery’s lifespan, you must take into account its cycles and the temperature effects on that battery.  The first characteristic, a battery’s cycles, is the main determinate of the battery’s lifespan.  A cycle occurs every time the battery’s stored energy is discharged.  For example, “a battery [that] discharges 50% everyday will last twice as long as one that is cycled to 80%.”   The second characteristic, the temperature’s effect on a battery, can increase or decrease a battery’s life and storage capacity.  The standard temperature for rating a battery is 77 degree Fahrenheit.  At 32 degrees Fahrenheit, the storage capacity is reduced by 20%; however, the lifespan increases by 60%.  At 122 degrees Fahrenheit, the storage capacity is increased by 12%.  In addition, for every 15 degrees over the 77 degrees standard, the battery’s lifespan can be reduced by 50%.  In average conditions, an AGM deep cycle battery can last up to four years (Deep Cycle Batteries, n.d.).

Imgae 3 - A water collection cistern system

The third element in creating an independent shelter is water collection and minimalization.  The first step, when sizing a cistern system, is determining the total water consumption of the shelter per day.  In a post-disaster situation, the top priority must be water conservation.  Due to phys.ufl.edu, the average water usage per day per person is 30 gallons.  In addition, the production rate per square foot of roof area per inch of rain is 0.6.  However, the 30 gallons refers to an average household, which includes during laundry and three sinks.  By removing the laundry component and reducing the sinks to two, the water needed per person per day is condensed to 21 gallons. 

Using these variables, a shelter, which houses 3 people for 60 days, would require 3,780 gallons of water (21 gallons per person per day x 60 day shelter duration x 2 people).  In addition, a 400 square foot shelter, with a 2 foot overhang, can produce 345.6 gallons of usable water per 1 inch or rain (567 square feet of roof area x 0.6 production rate x 0.1 overflow coefficient) (Determining Need, n.d.).  According to The Weather Channel, the average precipitation per month in New Orleans, during peak hurricane season (June - August), is 6.4 inches.  Therefore, the 3,780 gallon minimum can be surpassed (345.6 gallons x 12.8 inches = 4,423.7 gallons) (Monthly Averages, n.d.).

Image 4 - The process of turning human waste into usable fertilizer using a composting toilet

The best solution to minimize water use is to install a composite toilet.  In 1971, Hardy Sundberg developed the first waterless toilet reducing the average domicile water average by 45%.  This is accomplished by using “aerobic bacteria to convert the carbon atoms in the waste to carbon dioxide, and the hydrogen atoms to water” (The History of, n.d., para. 1).  Therefore, the separated water can be used and collected in a grey water system.  In addition, utilizing the aerobic bacteria and the three step process of composting, evaporation, and finishing, a composite toilet can have many advantages which include being an odorless system, using little or no water, and can be installed anywhere (The History of, n.d.).

Image 5 - How the Bernoulli porduces a lifting force

             The fourth element to create an independent shelter is counteracting the wind’s lifting force.  Utilizing an area’s wind pattern can decrease a structure’s dependency on electricity.   However, a major problem with structures located in tornado and hurricane-prone areas, is the wind’s ability to create a lifting force which can demolish a structure’s roof.  The most popular way for a structure to become destroyed in a high wind situation, is the lifting the roof.  Once the roof is removed, the integrity of the overall structure is weakened, usually resulting in the total destruction of the structure.  Using Bernoulli’s Principal, a roof can be designed to withstand the pressure a hurricane’s wind can produce.  Bernoulli’s Principal accounts for the pressure difference, on the interior and exterior of a structure, during a hurricane or tornado.

Image 6 - How the Bernoulli Effect's lifting force affects on a house


             In a hurricane, the air in a structure is still; therefore, in Bernoulli’s equation, “the pressure difference between the inside and outside of the roof is half the air density multiplied by the wind speed squared (Heckert, P).  During a 150 m.p.h. category 5 hurricane, with an air density of 1.3 kilograms per cubic meter, the difference in pressure from inside to outside is 0.4 pounds per square inch.  For the 250 square foot Uber Shelter, there would be a lifting force of nearly 14,400 pounds (multiplying 250 square feet by 144 square inches per square foot by 0.4 pounds per square inch).  However, a roof’s mass must be calculated to determine the net lifting force. 

Assuming [a roof] has about the same density as water (1,000 kilograms per cubic meter), a roof’s mass can be roughly estimated.  Wood is less dense [than water], thus it floats; however, nails and roofing materials are denser, [as a result, the two approximately average out].  Mass is density times volume.  If [a 250] square foot (22.5 square meters) roof is about 0.1 meters thick, its volume is 2.25 cubic meters.  Multiplying gives an approximate mass of 2,250 kilograms, [which rounds to] 4,500 pounds (Heckert, 2007, para. 7).

The net lifting force of 150 mph winds on a 250 square foot roof (the lifting force minus the weight) equals about 9,900 pounds. 

To contradict the lifting force of the Bernoulli Effect, certain measures need to be taken to firmly anchor the roof to the walls and ground structure.  The forces are then transferred to a solid foundation.  In traditional domicile construction, roof trusses are toe-nailed to the top of walls, providing little to no structural strength.  However, many products have been designed to improve traditional anchoring systems.  One technique is to nail metal straps to the wall, which then wrap over the truss.  Another technique, temporary hurricane straps, can quickly anchor a roof structure to the foundation, ensuring structural strength (Heckert , 2007).

Text
    Deep Cycle Batteries. (n.d.). Northern Arizona Wind and Sun. Retrieved January 4, 2011, from
         http://www.windsun.com/Batteries/Battry_FAQ.htm
    Determining the Need. (n.d.). Retrieved January 2, 2011, from htpp://www.phys.ufl.edu/-liz/
        water.html
    The History of SUN-MAR is the History of Composting Toilets. (n.d.). Retrieved January
         2, 2011, from http://www.sun-mar.com
    Heckert, P. (2007, May 15). Why a Tornado or Hurricane Can Lift the Roof off a House.
         Retrieved January 3, 2011, from fttp://wwwsuite101.com/content/bernoullis-principle-
         and-storms-a21290.
    Knight, H. (2010, April). Green Machine: Cheaper Home Power from Sunlight. Retrieved
         January 2, 2011, from http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18822-green-machine-
         cheaper-home-power-from-sunlight.html
    Monthly Averages for New Orleans, LA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 4, 2011, from http://www.
         weather.com/outlook/travel/vacationplanner/vacationclimatology/monthly/USLA0338

Images
    Image 1 - http://www.treehugger.com/orange-solar-tents-image.jpg
    Image 2 - http://sunenergyfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/solar-energy-storage.jpg
    Image 3 - http://www.thecistern.comstorage/roofcooling__diagram.jpg
    Image 4 - http://static.howstuffworks.com/gif/composting-toilet-diagram.gif
    Image 5 - http://reniyoung.files.wordpress.com/2010/11/bernoullis-principal.jpg
    Image 6 -  http://www.stormsurvival.org/image/windforces.JPG

The Use of Public Participation in Shelter Design

Our Country, to be prepared for a disaster such as Katrina, should have developed a temporary shelter beforehand, knowing that eventually it would be in need.  By doing so, the FEMA trailers could have been tested to find out what needed to be done to provide a safe comfortable place to call “home.”  In addition to being tested, the best way to find out what people need is to ask the publics’ opinion.  If our Country would have been ready for a “Katrina,” then FEMA would not have turned into a curse word in the south. 

Due to the World Bank, there are four stages of a post-disaster event: migration, preparedness, response, and recovery.  However, in a study by Hass and Kates, the four stages are search and rescue, repairing the infrastructure, replacement, and reconstruction.  In addition, they discussed four stages of supplying a shelter to displaced victims.  Stage one is moving people to emergency shelters, such as the Superdome.  Stage two is supplying temporary shelters, such as a tent.  Stage three is providing temporary housing, such as a FEMA trailer.  The last stage is permanent housing.


Image 1 - Thousands of newly homeless individuals seeking refuge within the Superdome after Katrina destroyed levees within New Orleans

In 1999, responding to an earthquake in Turkey, the World Bank requested that social surveys be conducted by all local universities.  From these surveys, the World Bank developed a report that stated that public participation, in collaboration with nongovernmental organizations, would be mandatory in the area’s reconstruction process.  The reason for this is participation of the inhabitants would ensure trust within the rest of the community, as well as conveying their “needs” and “wants” to the designer of the temporary shelters.  In addition to this, the World Bank conveyed three ways the publics’ opinion would be gathered: surveys, interviews, and focus groups. 

The World Bank’s research for gaining the publics’ opinions was very beneficial. However, to be beneficial, the World Bank would have to employ the feedback in their designs.  When it came time to use the information they gathered, the World Bank only incorporated small amounts of the publics’ feedback into their design.  Due to this, many problems arose.  In a report, two problems came to the surface.  After being used, the shelters were not designed to fit the cultural needs of the inhabitants.  One example is the shelter’s Western style toilet, which is not usually comfortable for the elderly.  In addition, they discovered that the average household size in the area was 4.5 people.  However, the World Bank provided temporary sheltering that was only comfortably suitable for one to two people.

Image 2 - A small shelter that would be used for a large family in Turkey

After Emal and Sukumar Ganapati’s case study on the World Bank’s actions in response to Turkey’s earthquake in 1999, they developed four recommendations to improve designs for a future disaster.  The first recommendation is to rethink the assumption concerning urgency.  In their study, they realized that the majority of displaced individuals would be willing to wait a small period of time for temporary sheltering if the end result would be better suited for their “needs.”  The second recommendation is to involve the public in the design process of post-disaster shelters.  Unlike the World Bank, the Ganapatis’ believe future organizations should not wait until the designs are complete to ask the people what they need.  The third recommendation is to create a design through a collaboration of various groups and organizations.  Instead of the creation by a single international governmental organization, a shelter solution should be formulated with the participation from private groups, governmental and non-governmental organizations, and the individuals of the community.  The last recommendation is allowing feedback from the current shelter to be incorporated in future designs.  Once a problem arose, the World Bank should not disregard the users’ comments.  However, they should create a design to solve them (Ganapati, 2009). 

Image 3 - An aerial view of an apartment complex that was destroyed after the 1999 7.4 earthquake rumbled Turkey

Text
    Ganapati, S. (2009 December, 1). Enabling Participatory Planning After Disasters: A Case
         Study of the World Bank's Housing Reconstruction in Turkey. Journal of the American
         Planning Association. 75, 41-59.

Images
    Image 1 - http://photos.thefirstpost.co.uk/assets/library/090817picturepast--
                    125026218379370800.jpg
    Image 2 - http://www.iveknownrivers.org/stories/vol_002/darrell-jordan/superdome.jpg
    Image 3 - http://static.dezeen.com/uploads/2008/05/pallet13.jpg

The Design of a Successful Temporary Shelter

When designing a post-disaster temporary shelter, it is beneficial, both in time and expenses, to develop a design process, as well as specific criteria for the design.  In a time-lacking design situation, such as an eleven month thesis project, modifying a previously developed design process and criteria to fit your environmental conditions can save time that can be used for a number of thing: to interview the people of New Orleans to discover their “needs” and “wants” in a temporary shelter, developing a better shelter design, and creating a scaled shelter prototype.

 Image 1 - Interviewing the users to discover their needs and wants in a shelter

To respond to a JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) report, stating that Istanbul will soon experience a catastrophic earthquake leaving 600,000 people homeless, the MobARCH research project was designed to develop a temporary shelter for when an earthquake does strike.  The main goal of the MobARCH project was to take the needs and requirements of the users into consideration when designing a shelter, while having minimal impacts on the built environment. 

Their design process is composed of four processes: setting objectives, developing a design, evaluating the design, and creating alternatives to find the “best” design.  During these procedures, the MobARCH’s project only uses two types of information sources including past experiences and past temporary shelters.  Therefore, they are deploying similar philosophical ideals conveyed in this thesis. Through their research, they have determined that imperfections are mainly caused from past shelters not being analyzed for their inhabitants or the environment.  This has been proven after researching the Yanikoy-Kocaeli temporary shelter camp.  In the camp,

 it was observed that 48% of the users have made modifications both indoors and outdoors to their shelter unit, 30% of the users have made modifications only outdoors, and 3% of the users have made modifications only indoors.  Only 19% of the users have not made any modifications to their shelter units (Sener, 2009, p. 61).

Image 2 - Architects, engineers, and the area's locals come together to create the best solution possible

In the design process, MobARCH uses seven criteria when designing: materials, ecological aspects, the design cost, aesthetics, a building’s physics, spatial organization, and sociological aspects.  These seven criteria are then broken down into thirty sub categories including: structural performance, fast assembly, indoor climatic control, thermal performance, privacy, lighting, room interaction, visual aesthetics, and responding to the elderly and disabled.  Even to MobARCH standards, it is impossible to design for every possible situation that could occur.  Therefore, the following list covers the highest ranking criteria, and possible solution to design a temporary shelter after.  These bulleted criteria come directly (cited) from the MobARCH research project guidelines (Sener, 2009, p. 66-67).

v  The basic material for the unit shall be wood in fulfilling design criteria such as: “avoiding environmental pollution of any kind,” “using recyclable materials,” and “creating sustainability.”
v  The shelter shall be constructed of prefabricated wood panels in fulfilling design criteria such as: “ease of construction” and “ease of manufacturing.”
v  The panels shall be 220 pounds in weight at most and 9’ x 3’ in dimensions in fulfilling design criteria such as: “ease of transportation.”
v  The prefabricated wood panels shall have simple connecting details and limited components in fulfilling design criteria such as: “ease of assembly.”
v  The prefabricated panels shall be a sandwich panel with mineral thermal insulation in fulfilling design criteria such as: “interior climatic comfort” and “energy efficiency.”
v  The two sub units shall provide optimum space in fulfilling criteria such as: “space requirements related to basic actions” and “acoustical and visual privacy.”
v  The unit shall give the opportunity to be constructed by the users themselves in fulfilling design criteria such as: “user’s aesthetic preferences,” “allowing personalization,” and “creating social relations.”

The sub-criteria, listed above, are taken into consideration, with the accumulated knowledge, to design the best possible solution for a post-disaster temporary shelter.  Following their design process, the second to last step, after employing a prototype, is evaluating the shelter in the built environment.  The last phase is determining the flaws and providing a timely solution to them.  In the end, after following the MobARCH’s design process, the product can be a well designed shelter that fits the needs of the inhabitants, as well as the built environment (Sener, 2009).

Text
    Sener, S. (2009 February). Design of a Post-Disaster Temporaty Shelter Unit, ITU AIZ. 6, 69-72.

Images
    Image 1 - http://amandaw89.files.wordpress.com/2010/03/volunteer-in-an-interview.jpg
    Image 2 - http://artmorrical.com/photo_gallery/2004%20Architects%20meeting.JPG